October 5, 2024

News , Article

Russia India

Russia's President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi ahead of their meeting at Hyderabad House in New Delhi, India, December 6, 2021. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi - RC209R9SCYIG

Russia praises ‘constructive’ role of India’s G20 presidency

Russia claimed on Sunday that the G20 finance ministers’ meeting in Bengaluru ended without a joint communique due to the “confrontational” attitude of the “collective West” towards Moscow over the situation in Ukraine.

The G20 meeting of finance ministers and central bank governors on Saturday was unable to produce a joint communique due to Russia and China’s opposition to making any references to the Ukraine conflict.

As the holder of the G20 presidency, India issued a chair’s summary at the end of the meeting.

The Russian foreign ministry, in a statement, referred to “the constructive role” of the Indian presidency and its efforts to have a “fair consideration of interests and positions of all countries”.

”The balanced approaches formulated in this context create a good foundation for responding to modern challenges in the area of global finance and related sectors, including support for economic growth and implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals,” it said.

The Russian foreign ministry said that as a result of the substantive dialogue on topical financial issues, a wide range of measures was agreed upon which were designed to give an additional impetus to the global economy and financial markets.

”We regret that the activities of the G20 continue to be destabilised by the collective West and used in an anti-Russian, purely confrontational manner,” it said.

”Our opponents, primarily the United States, the EU and the G7, continue their paranoid attempts to isolate Russia and shift the blame for the provoked problems in the area of international security and the global economy onto it,” it alleged.

The Russian foreign ministry accused the West of throwing up what it called ”absurd interpretations of the situation in Ukraine”.

”As a result, the fully approved text of the document, except for the wording on Ukraine, which gives out for assessments of the discussion at the ministerial meeting something that was not actually discussed and is unrelated to the topic of its jurisdiction, had become a hostage to this aggressive line,” it said.