HC Grants Bail to Two Accomplices of Former BJP MLA

In a significant development, the Bombay High Court on Monday granted bail to two individuals arrested in connection with the assault on former Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction) corporator Mahesh Gaikwad and his supporters. The incident occurred in February 2024, following a shocking altercation at the Hill Line police station in Ulhasnagar, involving former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad, who allegedly shot at Mahesh Gaikwad during a tense situation.

The police arrested the two accused, who authorities believe are accomplices of Ganpat Gaikwad, soon after the violent confrontation. The police charged them with assaulting Mahesh Gaikwad and his supporters, who had gathered at the police station following the shooting. According to the police, the accused played a pivotal role in the violent attack that occurred immediately after the former BJP MLA fired at the corporator, escalating an already tense situation.

The incident began when Ganpat Gaikwad allegedly shot Mahesh Gaikwad in a confrontation at the Hill Line police station, leading to widespread shock and panic. Witnesses reported that the altercation quickly turned violent, with the two accused assaulting Mahesh Gaikwad and his supporters in what appeared to be an organized attack. The police arrested the two individuals on charges of assault, unlawful assembly, and other related offenses.

Also Read: Northeast India: Received the recognition as a travel destination

Involvement of Shiv Sena and BJP Members Highlighted

The case gained significant attention due to the political nature of the incident, as both Mahesh Gaikwad and Ganpat Gaikwad are well-known political figures in the region, with Mahesh Gaikwad being a prominent member of the Shiv Sena faction led by Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, and Ganpat Gaikwad a former BJP MLA. The incident has raised questions about the involvement of political rivalries and how they may have influenced the violent confrontation at the police station.

The two accused individuals sought bail, arguing that they had not directly participated in the shooting and that their involvement in the assault stemmed from unclear and unverified claims. They maintained that they faced wrongful implication in the case. On the other hand, the prosecution opposed the bail plea, emphasizing the severity of the charges and the need to ensure justice.

As the investigation continues, the focus now shifts to determining the full extent of the involvement of all individuals in the incident. Police have promised a thorough investigation and have assured that the legal process will continue without any interference. Meanwhile, the political dynamics surrounding the case, involving members of both the Shiv Sena and BJP, are expected to evolve as the case moves forward.

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the political landscape in Maharashtra, particularly in the context of the ongoing rivalry between the Shiv Sena and the BJP. It also raises important questions about the role of law enforcement in handling politically sensitive incidents and ensuring impartiality in such high-profile cases.

Also Read: Emergency Kangana Ranaut Swift Take on Indira Gandhi’s Legacy