‘An Exceptional Case’: Supreme Court Gives Relief to Sonam Raghuvanshi

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to send murder accused Sonam Raghuvanshi back to jail. However, the court raised serious preliminary concerns about the Meghalaya High Court’s bail order. The Meghalaya government challenged Sonam’s bail in the Raja Raghuvanshi murder case. Justices MM Sundresh and Sheel Nagu heard the state government’s appeal. The bench said courts generally treat bail as the rule. It described imprisonment as an exception under established criminal law principles. The judges said courts must maintain balance even in serious criminal cases. They noted that Sonam had already spent considerable time in custody. The bench said grave allegations alone cannot automatically justify cancelling bail. The court issued notice to Sonam and scheduled further hearing for July 9.

Read More: Over ₹9,300 Crore Unclaimed in 31 Lakh EPF Accounts Across India

Why the Supreme Court Did Not Stay Sonam’s Bail Order

The bench said it may have stayed the bail order earlier. However, Sonam had already left prison under the High Court’s judicial order. The judges said courts must act carefully before returning released accused persons. They stressed greater caution because the trial has already begun. The bench said trial courts must decide disputed facts through evidence. It also repeated that every accused retains presumed innocence until conviction. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta called the allegations shocking and chilling. Despite those submissions, the court declined to immediately suspend Sonam’s bail. Meghalaya informed the court that Sonam had already reached Shillong after release. This information persuaded the bench against passing an interim stay. The court will now examine the case after receiving Sonam’s response.

The Supreme Court expressed reservations about the High Court’s reasoning behind Sonam’s bail. Justice Sundresh said the bench had concerns about the High Court’s approach. The High Court relied heavily on errors within Sonam’s arrest documents. Police documents mentioned Section 403 instead of murder-related Section 103 of BNS. The High Court also found unrelated allegations in the arrest papers. It described the documents as showing serious administrative non-application of mind. The Supreme Court questioned whether such defects justified bail in murder allegations. The bench noted that police had informed Sonam about arrest reasons. Judges also noted that Sonam never raised this issue earlier. She had filed three unsuccessful bail applications before the High Court order. The bench said the alleged document error caused no demonstrated prejudice.

Read more: Himachal Rain Fury: 4 Killed, 49 Roads Closed; Orange Alert Till July 5

Raja Raghuvanshi Murder Case: What Happened in Meghalaya

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta presented strong arguments for the Meghalaya government. He said the High Court ignored substantial material gathered during the investigation. The state alleged that Sonam planned the murder with Raj Kushwaha. Prosecutors also named other co-accused in the alleged conspiracy. Mehta said Sonam travelled to Meghalaya with three alleged accomplices. The state claimed she actively participated in the assault on Raja. Prosecutors alleged that the group later disposed of Raja’s body. They claimed the accused threw his body into a gorge. The government called the incorrect legal section a typographical error. It said the mistake did not affect Sonam’s legal rights. The Supreme Court will now hear detailed arguments from both sides.

Raja Raghuvanshi was a 29-year-old businessman from Indore, Madhya Pradesh. He travelled to Meghalaya with Sonam after their wedding in May 2025. The couple went on a honeymoon trip shortly after marriage. They checked out from a homestay in Nongriat on May 23. Their families and police later reported them missing from the area. Police recovered Raja’s body near Weisawdong Falls in Sohra. Authorities later traced Sonam in Uttar Pradesh after several days. Meghalaya Police filed a chargesheet exceeding seven hundred pages in court. Investigators described the murder as a premeditated conspiracy involving several accused. The trial has started, and courts have begun recording witness testimonies.

Read more: CCTV captures horrific LPG tanker blast at UP toll plaza; 4 dead