Supreme Court halts Kuldeep Sengar’s bail; convict will remain in custody

The Supreme Court stayed the Delhi High Court’s bail order for Kuldeep Singh Sengar Monday. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, highlighted substantial questions of law involved in the case. The Sengar will continue remaining in custody, as he already serves a sentence in a separate case. The court issued notice to Sengar, seeking his response on the Central Bureau of Investigation plea. The Chief Justice observed that the High Court’s interpretation of public servant provisions raised legal complications.

Also read: Dhanashree Verma Responds to Chahal’s Denial, Says She Caught Him Cheating Early On

Supreme Court Stays Kuldeep Sengar’s Bail in Unnao Rape Case

The Supreme Court clarified that ordinarily it does not stay High Court bail orders without hearings. The bench emphasized that legal consistency and public interest must guide decisions regarding bail and custody. However, this case involves peculiar facts, including Sengar’s prior conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC. It highlighted potential consequences of excluding MLAs or MPs from accountability under existing public servant provisions. The survivor may file an independent special leave petition and will receive free legal aid if needed.

The case began in 2017 when a minor girl accused Sengar of raping her in Unnao. Local authorities reportedly delayed filing an FIR, and the survivor and her family faced threats repeatedly. In April 2018, she attempted self-immolation outside Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s residence publicly. The Following protests and media scrutiny, the CBI took over the investigation to ensure impartial proceedings. The Supreme Court later transferred the trial from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi for fair legal process.

Also read: Sources: Mohsin Naqvi Presents Trophy to UAE Board as BCCI Considers Impeachment Action

Background of the Unnao Rape Case

In 2019, Delhi court convicted Sengar for rape and sentenced him to life imprisonment actively. He also received convictions in cases connected to the custodial death of the survivor’s father legally. Sengar faced additional convictions for attempting to influence witnesses, while several family members were found guilty similarly. The Supreme Court noted these convictions as significant while staying the High Court bail order immediately. Judges emphasized maintaining public confidence by ensuring convicted individuals remain accountable while legal questions continue under review.

The court directed that Sengar will not be released under any existing High Court bail provisions currently. The bench emphasized that the survivor retains the right to file separate petitions independently without restrictions legally. Free legal aid will be provided through the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee if requested efficiently. The court highlighted balancing convict rights with survivors’ safety and ensuring public trust in legal processes nationally. Judges underlined that the peculiar facts of this case justify exceptional intervention beyond ordinary High Court practice.

Also read: Dhanashree Verma Responds to Chahal’s Denial, Says She Caught Him Cheating Early On