July 28, 2026

Central Times

Most Trusted News on the go

settlement

Johnson & Johnson Reaches $5.5 Billion Settlement in Baby Powder Cancer Cases

Johnson & Johnson has agreed to a proposed $5.5 billion settlement to resolve approximately 76,000 ovarian cancer lawsuits in the United States. The lawsuits alleged that the company’s talc-based baby powder and similar products caused ovarian cancer after long-term use. The proposed agreement could end one of the largest product liability disputes in U.S. corporate history. However, the settlement will become effective only if at least 95 percent of eligible claimants approve the offer. The company expects to begin making payments in 2027, with additional payments continuing into 2028. Legal experts believe the final payout could increase if more eligible claimants participate in the settlement process. The agreement now awaits approval from the affected plaintiffs before becoming legally binding.

Also Read : U.S. Launches More Strikes on Iran as Tensions Rise; Bangkok Pub Fire Kills 27

Company Maintains Products Were Safe Despite Settlement

Johnson & Johnson continues to deny that its talc-based products caused ovarian cancer or contained asbestos. The company stated that extensive scientific research supports the safety of its products. Company officials explained that the settlement reflects a business decision rather than an admission of liability. They said the agreement will help the company avoid years of costly litigation and focus on developing medicines and medical devices. Erik Haas, the company’s Vice President of Litigation, said Johnson & Johnson remained confident about its legal position despite choosing settlement. The company believes resolving the remaining lawsuits will provide certainty for both claimants and shareholders after more than a decade of courtroom battles.

Thousands of women claimed they developed ovarian cancer after regularly using Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder and other talc-based products. Many lawsuits also alleged that the products contained asbestos, a substance linked to several serious cancers. Johnson & Johnson consistently rejected these allegations and argued that decades of scientific evidence supported product safety. The company stopped selling talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in the United States during 2020 and replaced the product with a cornstarch-based alternative. Despite maintaining its defense, the company decided that a comprehensive settlement offered the most practical solution to resolve the long-running legal dispute.

Also Read : Vijay says he trusted police, but was blamed for the stampede during his first visit to Karur as CM

Decade-Long Legal Battle Included Bankruptcy Attempts

The litigation continued for more than ten years and included multiple jury trials, appeals, and several major legal challenges. Johnson & Johnson attempted to resolve the claims through a controversial bankruptcy strategy known as the “Texas Two-Step.” Under that approach, the company created a subsidiary to handle talc-related liabilities through bankruptcy proceedings. Courts rejected all three bankruptcy filings, allowing the lawsuits to continue. Although the company secured several favorable court rulings, including decisions limiting certain scientific evidence, it ultimately pursued a nationwide settlement to avoid prolonged legal uncertainty. The proposed agreement covers existing lawsuits but does not prevent future claimants from filing new legal actions.

The proposed settlement represents a significant turning point in one of the most closely watched corporate legal disputes in the United States. If at least 95 percent of eligible claimants accept the offer, Johnson & Johnson could finally resolve nearly all remaining ovarian cancer lawsuits involving its talc products. The company hopes the agreement will bring closure to years of expensive litigation while allowing existing plaintiffs to receive compensation more quickly. However, failure to reach the required approval threshold could force both sides back into lengthy courtroom proceedings. The final outcome now depends on whether the required majority of claimants accepts the proposed settlement terms.

Also Read : U.S. Launches More Strikes on Iran as Tensions Rise; Bangkok Pub Fire Kills 27