Metro delay row: SC criticises Bengal govt’s stance

Supreme Court of India on Monday rejected the West Bengal government’s plea to delay the Kolkata Orange Line Metro project. The court criticised the state’s approach and called the stand “obstinate.” It also said the state had politicised the issue without reason. Chief Justice Surya Kant led the bench and said the petition looked “frivolous.” The bench added that the state was trying to stall the work. The judges stressed that such projects must move without delay.

Meanwhile, the state challenged a December 23 order of the Calcutta High Court, which directed authorities to complete work at Chingrighata crossing by February 15. It cited upcoming elections and asked for time till May. The state argued that election duties would create problems and disrupt planning. It also highlighted logistical challenges during this period. However, the court did not accept these reasons.

Court rejects Metro delay plea

However, the bench dismissed the request and said the government should not seek relief in such matters. The judges noted that authorities had started the project earlier. They said elections cannot stop development work. The court made it clear that public projects must continue. It added that governance cannot pause for elections.

Furthermore, the court directed the state to follow the high court’s order and provide full support. It asked authorities to arrange police help and traffic control. The bench said the state failed in its duty. It added that the delay showed poor responsibility. The judges also said the state turned the issue political without need. They stressed that authorities must follow orders strictly.

Also Read : ₹12 Lakh Crore Lost in an Hour: Why Markets Crashed Today

Strong remarks on state’s stand

Additionally, the court criticised the state for citing festivals as a reason. It said festivals cannot block development work. The judges stressed that public transport projects remain important. They said such work benefits millions of people. The bench added that priorities must stay clear. Development should come first in such cases.

On the other hand, the state’s counsel spoke about public inconvenience. She said the route serves ambulances and organ transport. Nevertheless, the bench said the high court had already shown leniency. It warned that it could take strict action. Senior officials could face consequences. The judges clearly showed their displeasure.

Finally, the state asked to withdraw its plea. The court refused this request and said it had already given that chance earlier. The bench allowed the high court to act and take steps to enforce its order. It also noted that a contempt petition against officials remains pending.

Also Read : IIT Finds Ancient Moon Clue, Aids Chandrayaan-4